<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Search Nuggets &#187; user story</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.comperiosearch.com/blog/tag/user-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.comperiosearch.com</link>
	<description>A blog about Search as THE solution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 08:59:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Relevance tuning in the search domain. What is it exactly?</title>
		<link>http://blog.comperiosearch.com/blog/2014/03/07/recipe-app-relevance-tuning-what-is-it-exactly/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.comperiosearch.com/blog/2014/03/07/recipe-app-relevance-tuning-what-is-it-exactly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 16:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Espen Klem]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recipe app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relevance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relevancy tuning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.comperiosearch.com/?p=2032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First thing first! Let&#8217;s get rid of the bullshit bingo lingo: &#8220;Relevancy tuning&#8221; in search is a fancy description for something that&#8217;s not very magical, even if it sounds like just that. It&#8217;s about getting the right results on top of your search result. End of story. If somebody asks you a question, you should [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First thing first! Let&#8217;s get rid of the bullshit bingo lingo: &#8220;Relevancy tuning&#8221; in search is a fancy description for something that&#8217;s not very magical, even if it sounds like just that. It&#8217;s about getting the right results on top of your search result. End of story. If somebody asks you a question, you should start by giving that person the most likely answer first. Most search engines seems to be digressing. It&#8217;s because we haven&#8217;t told in a clear manner what to be expected from them. And because we often use generic tools to solve specific problems.</p>
<p>One generic tool for getting the right results on top is the &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tf%E2%80%93idf">term frequency–inverse document frequency</a>&#8220;, or <a href="https://www.google.no/?gfe_rd=ctrl&amp;ei=_NAZU7qjL8-AwAP6_oCgBg&amp;gws_rd=cr#q=tf-idf&amp;safe=off">tf-idf</a> for short. It&#8217;s a combination of how often a term is mentioned in a document compared to how often it&#8217;s mentioned in all of your documents in the index. So, rare terms within the whole index used often in one document makes it a good search result when searching for that term. But most likely, not good enough. You need to figure out what&#8217;s the characteristics of your content, and what are the most characteristic use cases and user stories for your users. Only then can you achieve great relevancy, &#8230;  I mean get the right result on top of your search result.</p>
<h2>Model for relevance tuning</h2>
<p>We&#8217;ll use our Recipe app as an example&#8230;</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3122/12989606394_97436f539e_z.jpg" alt="Model for relevance tuning" width="360" height="640" /></p>
<p>So, for our food recipe app, we have some obvious content characteristics:</p>
<ul>
<li>The more ingredients in-season for one recipe is good. We&#8217;re doing an OR-search on all ingredients in-season so this comes out-of-the-box &#8230; almost.</li>
<li>Quite a lot of recipes doesn&#8217;t stand the test of time. We know that most of the recipes at oppskrift.klikk.no from 2008 or newer are quite good and have nice photos.</li>
<li>We&#8217;re not sure if we need this, but we know whom of the writers to trust. This may be an overkill when we already have a boosting on newer recipes.</li>
</ul>
<p>And we know a lot about our users as well:</p>
<ul>
<li>Most grown up people in Norway have a job, thus limited time to prepare a meal. This means that recipes that takes shorter preparations should be boosted from Monday through Thursday. The verdict on Friday is still not decided.</li>
<li>During the weekend people have more time to make dinner. The recipes that takes a short time to prepare most probably cut some corners, and are not that good compared to recipes that takes a little longer time. So for the weekends, we should do a demotion of really quick recipes, at least for dinners.</li>
</ul>
<p>This is the info we&#8217;re going to use to sort our search result. But we have more knowledge about our users that we can use to auto-set filters for certain times of the day:</p>
<ul>
<li>Most work days, people don&#8217;t plan a breakfast meal or lunch. The whole day we can auto-set the main &#8220;course&#8221; filter.</li>
<li>During the weekend, people may also plan a lunch. We&#8217;ve decided to auto-set the &#8220;light meal&#8221;-filter during weekends up until lunch time. After that the &#8220;main course&#8221; filter is auto-set. We&#8217;ll log if the first thing our users do is to set another filter.</li>
<li>On Friday and Saturday a lot of Norwegians drink beer, wine or liquor. After some hours of drinking, they get hungry. Maybe we should have an &#8220;afterparty, quick and greasy and tasty-meal&#8221;-filter auto-set for late Fridays and Saturdays?</li>
</ul>
<p>So, what&#8217;s the filters we&#8217;ve decided on:</p>
<ul>
<li>Light meals</li>
<li>Starters</li>
<li>Main courses</li>
<li>Deserts</li>
<li>&#8230; and maybe the Afterparty-thingy</li>
</ul>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3143/12988485805_d1a693e95c_z.jpg" alt="Model for relevance tuning" width="640" height="360" /></p>
<p>Sounds nice? This is work in progress, so <a href="http://blog.comperiosearch.com/blog/tag/recipe-app/">check back every now and then for new blog posts</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.comperiosearch.com/blog/2014/03/07/recipe-app-relevance-tuning-what-is-it-exactly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
